The contents of the Israeli Association of Rape Crisis Center’s paper alleging “systematic” Hamas rape derive largely from discredited second-hand testimonies and debunked media reports. Among its most heavily cited sources is a dubious NY Times article that triggered a staff revolt at the paper.

  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Is anyone else seeing these stories the last couple of days and bracing for some horrific evidence of

    spoiler

    The systematic and intentional rape of Palestinians by Isreali troops and settlers

    thats probably like a week from coming out? We know it’s all projection, we know they see Palestinians as “human animals”, we’ve seen the contrast between the chipper umharmed Isreali prisoners and the traumatized wraithlike Palestinians that were released during the prisoner exchange. We’ve seen the piles of bloody body bags in the desert and the reports of organ theft. It’s clear which side views the other as human beings and which side does not, howthe fuck are they gonna expect us to believe that akshually Hamas are the rapists, other than just banking on racism?

  • IbnLemmy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I did not upvote this because I’m worried I will be accused of antisemitism

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      In this case, it might also be a good call because of the source

      I’d prefer some other agency reported the story given Grayzone’s track record

  • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Blegh every war is a crime. I don’t know if there has ever been a war that didn’t involve rape. Even the allies in WWII (“a just war”) were infamous for that, both in the European and Pacific theaters. So it’s not surprising now.

    But yes, any Hamas who commit atrocities, may they burn in hell if there is such a place. Same as IDF and settlers who do so.

  • entropicshart@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t get the point of these arguments; people came across a border and opened fire on any person they saw! Just because they didn’t rape every single one of them as well does not make it any better.

    • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      In order to justify the Genocide you need to completely dehumanize Palestinians. That is the purpose of this propaganda. The same propaganda tactic has been used before.

    • abuttandahalf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is incorrect. The Palestinian fighters refrained from attacking Israeli civilians when they were able to. In many cases they did not do any harm to the Israeli civilians they interacted with and we’re in fact courteous towards them. They targeted military and police instead. A currently unknown portion of the deaths of israeli civilians on 7/10 was from Israeli fire. Witnesses and available evidence indicate that Israeli infantry, tanks, and helicopters fired indiscriminately at civilians, militants, and homes with occupants. Israel refuses to investigate its forces’ acts on 7/10 and destroyed and buried evidence (bombed cars).

      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I feel like many people don’t understand the horrors of modern conflict in dense urban areas,

        We know from WWII that bombing civilian centers kills a lot of innocent people. It’s not like anyone should be surprised that Israel’s relentless bombing campaign is murdering thousands.

        or have a good understanding that many of Israel actions are actually legal and justified.

        Legal how? By their own decision? They’ve committed war crimes and violated military norms. Roughly 1,000 Israelis were killed in a cowardly attack by Hamas, so Israel is “justified” in murdering over 20,000 Palestinians who had nothing to do with the attack?

        But unfortunately a number of Israelis also don’t understand that just because civilians die in war it doesn’t mean you can go out of your way to make it happen, and regardless of the enemy you are facing if you can’t toe the line I hope you find yourself at the end of a public rope.

        They’ve blocking aid. They’re geared up to move in and build more settlements on stolen Palestinian land. The Israeli public is divided, but there’s plenty of bloodthirsty soldiers sniping children and civilians foaming at the mouth to seize the land. There’s no one holding these people accountable. The IDF lies with every breath and shields their people from justice.

        Israel is no better than Russia (and probably worse).

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 months ago

          Considering the fact that Israel has killed more journalists, more healthcare workers, more aid workers, and more children during this conflict than Russia has in Ukraine I would say it is definitely worse. The invasion of Ukraine is wrong, but Gaza has become the world capital of war crimes.

          • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Just compare the civilian deaths: UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine has verified 30,457 civilian casualties since 24 February 2022, including 10,582 killed and 19,875 injured.

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wholeheartedly agree with you, thought the fact that they are not trustworthy is a different conversation than whether they are right on this one. They might be, it’s just that you shouldn’t take merely their word for it.

      I think this is a good reminder that one should always check their sources tho

      • athos77@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or, y’know, instead of racing to post content from potentially questionable outlets, people could wait until it’s confirmed by more reputable journalists. Or even just stop visiting questionable sites like this in the first place.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    Media bias / fact check for The Grayzone:

    Overall, we rate The Grayzone Far-Left Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and consistent one-sided reporting.