• Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Jimmy “we shouldn’t castigate ourselves for the Vietnam War” Carter supported the Mujahideen, the Shah, the El Salvadorian and Nicaraguan dictatorships and funded the Indonesian genocide in East Timor. All while preparing the soil for Reagan by ending the New Deal and embracing austerity.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the “shouldn’t castigate ourselves for the Vietnam War” tied in with his pardon of all draft dodgers.

      The rest, yeah, not the best. He also banned the reprocessing of nuclear waste into more fuel. Massively driving up the cost of nuclear power while also creating the problem of nuclear waste.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “more fuel” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that statement and you could have easily used a much more concerning description without being hyperbolic

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This video goes into exactly what isotopes are produced in a nuclear reactor after one cycle (all that’s legally allowed).

          94% of the Uranium put into a reactor comes out after one cycle as waste. All because 1% of that waste is plutonium. Which is an incredibly dense nuclear fuel. That 1% of plutonium, if burned, can outperform the remaining 94% of uranium.

            • chaogomu@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The point is, 94.8% of nuclear waste is unburnt uranium, 1% is plutonium, and the rest isn’t that dangerous long term.

              There’s no need to bury waste for hundreds of thousands of years, if you just remove and burn the stuff that is dangerous long term.

              And if burning plutonium for fuel is such a deal breaker, we can switch from the uranium fuel cycle over to the thorium fuel cycle. But that one too faces opposition, because most of the opposition is coming from the fossil fuel industry. They hate nuclear with a passion, because it decouples electricity from oil and natural gas. Which wind and solar currently do not.