Saudi Arabia’s wildly ambitious plan to build 500m tall, mirrored, 170km long parallel skyscrapers, forming a 1.5M population desert city has been curtailed to 2.4km long.

The news was broken by the financial news publication Bloomberg, which said that Saudi Arabia’s government had “scaled back its medium-term ambitions” for Neom, of which The Line is the most significant sub-project.

The Saudi government had hoped to have 1.5M residents living in The Line by 2030, but this has been scaled back to fewer than 300,000, according to the report. It is unclear how it intends to house a higher concentration of people considering the proposed length (and therefore area) has been massively slashed.

  • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Also: this city has only one road. How is traffic going to be? Better hope you somehow get a flat near your work, and that everyone else does too, and that nobody ever moves or cha’mnges job for any reason. This is such a horsehit project I’m surprised the guy who proposed it didn’t get thrown out of the window like in the meme.

    • jmcs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      Their plan was to have most people commute by train and have a veritable army of self-driving trains. That’s easily the most well thought part of the harebrained idea.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not just train

        Hyperloop

        You know the thing that totally exists and wasn’t a scam to stop California from installing high speed rail that would cut into a certain company’s EV sales.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Never mind commuter traffic, imagine how long it would take necessary commodities to the right places in a timely manner!

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I never looked into it more than a tertiary “Holy shit that looks dumb,” and yet somehow it’s even dumber than I thought!

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Like I said- if you need to get to the other side of a normal city, you can avoid congestion by taking a different route.

              In a linear city, there is only one route. If there is a traffic jam or a train derailment in a linear city, there are no alternative routes. Not even for an ambulance.

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I would assume you have two routes, one either side, both directions for this exact reason.

                If anything it will be more reliable and cost effective as every mass transit can be used by anyone.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It’s very easy for one truck crash to block off both directions of a road. Even a very wide road. I know because I’ve experienced it.

                  I’m really not sure why you don’t understand why having multiple alternate routes from A to B would be a big advantage.

                  • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Im saying two separate highways, one on either side rather than two directions next to each other.

                    I live in a city full of peninsulas and harbours - well aware how much it sucks having one way in and out of places. The difference is that they were never planned and designed for current volumes, vehicles and logistics - this can be.

    • Lath@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I thought the proposed plans had multiple level high speed rails inside?