• rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    with New PipeWire Audio Backend

    facepalm

    https://xkcd.com/927/

    I thought PipeWire was supposed to be an implementation of the PulseAudio and JACK APIs, requiring no new public API. Disappointing.

    • Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pipewire offers different ways of interacting with it. There are compatibility layers for example for pulseaudio and Jack.
      This is a good thing imo. That way you have compatibility, but aren’t held back by legacy interfaces.

    • noddy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The qemu pulseaudio support wasn’t very good though. Very finicky to set up, and a lot of stuttering issues. Maybe this was an opportunity to implement something better with pipewire.