• burgersc12@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Did you read the article? The article shows a post from Sponsorblock and it specifically states that they turned off sponsor block submissions on effected browsers since they can’t be reliable with the new ad delivery method

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      This breaks the current SB implementation, but if the ad duration is known and consistent across the userbase then it will fix itself as users tag videos with the “new” timestamps.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, but the article didn’t say anything about consistent durations and spacing. It might be the case, but I have no idea how to find that out.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Consistent duration can be assumed, because that’s how advertising works. The 15-second spot is still the standard.

          • burgersc12@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I mean it might be, or they could decide to deliver 30 second ads to people they think are more likely to watch and 15s to ones they don’t. I don’t know enough about this implementation, for all I know they could have offset it by a few seconds because of Sponsorblock. Seems like they’d do anything to try to push more ads so who really knows at this point?