• WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bears are pretty chill honestly. I would generally take a bear over a strange man or woman in the woods. Unknown humans with unknown means and intentions are much more dangerous than a bear, hands down. In order: bear, woman, man. But it’s like 85% bear, 10% woman, 5% man.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The only bear I’d be concerned about was a bear with a cub. If you see one, you are already in danger. So I’d say single bear > woman > man >>> bear with cub

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you see one, you are already in danger.

        I live somewhere where the most deadly animal we have are horses.

        Is it just that being close enough to see a bear and cub is close enough that the bear considers you an imminent threat?

    • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      100% bear, 0% women/men

      or is it the inverse 0% bear, 100% women/men

      people are easy. A bear can climb as well as running faster than me