• Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can only see photons when they bounce off something and into your eye. So you have no way to see the photons as they travel towards and through the slit, only after they hit a wall on the other side and reflect back to you.

    So there’s no way for you to observe the photons with your eyes before they’ve gone through the slit. In order to observe them as they head to the slit you need to hit the photons with something to measure where they are, and it’s this interaction that collapses the waveform and makes the light travel though a single slit of the two.

      • Hasherm0n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I had a physics teacher in college who explained it like this.

        Imagine we see by throwing tennis balls. You know the shape of something (and he gestured at a giant whale skeleton in the lecture hall) by Knowing where the tennis ball bounces off of the shape. If we throw a lot of them, we can “observe” the shape of an object.

        Now imagine the object we want to observe is another tennis ball. With the skeleton, the tennis ball, even meant of them, hitting it and bouncing off won’t effect it. But if we want to use our tennis ball sight to observe a tennis ball, it’s going to knock the tennis ball away, thus we’ve significantly effected it.

        The only way to “observe” a photon is to use something that will have a significant effect on it.

        This was some 15+ years ago, so I might be misremembering the details slightly, but that was more or less the gist of it.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The double slit experiment itself, or why simply looking at the double slit experiment doesn’t change the outcome?