ummthatguy@lemmy.world to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoWhat About Q?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1105arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1102arrow-down1imageWhat About Q?lemmy.worldummthatguy@lemmy.world to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
After making this, I realized “What About Barclay?” would be a better candidate, but Q works for this scene.
minus-squareummthatguy@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·10 months agoApparently, since 1962. Now we just need a better mark to denote sarcasm than /s.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·10 months agoConsidering the question mark is at least as old as the fifth century, I’d call 1962 new.
minus-squareHeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·10 months agoI’m working on a punctuation mark that looks like pelvic thrusting but it’s hard to get it on print
minus-squareummthatguy@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 months agoIt gets that way when you handle it like that.
minus-squarejmcslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months ago Now we just need a better mark to denote sarcasm than /s. What’s wrong with “⸮”?
Apparently, since 1962. Now we just need a better mark to denote sarcasm than /s.
Considering the question mark is at least as old as the fifth century, I’d call 1962 new.
I’m working on a punctuation mark that looks like pelvic thrusting but it’s hard to get it on print
It gets that way when you handle it like that.
What’s wrong with “⸮”?