It’s not that we’re uninformed, it’s that we disagree.

Preacher: Can you read, my son?

Bubbles: Well that depends; can you go fuck yourself?

source

Rule 2: Be kind and friendly.

You’re putting me off on participating here, and I’ve been nothing but kind and friendly. And you?

It did both, but not unique. I added an edit with a more robust solution.

Try this:

[char1 = char.selectOne.titleCase] gives the worst hot take about [char2 = char.selectOne.titleCase], and [char2] subsequently kills them over it.

Here you’re creating a placeholder (aka variable) for the character you’ve selected so you can reference it later on. I also added titleCase so the character name gets capitalized.

EDIT: The above does do random, but not unique. Here’s a working example I wrote:

https://perchance.org/41mlspb7hk#edit

Code:

title
  Let's do this

output
  [names = chars.consumableList, ""] [char1 = names.selectOne.titleCase] gives the worst hot take about [char2 = names.selectOne.titleCase], and [char2] subsequently kills them over it.

chars
  Chaz
  Karen
  Thad

What the fuck did I just trip upon?

That shit is hilarious!

He’s not our guy, buddy!

OSS’s Simple Sabotage Field Manual, 1944 (declassified)

Good memory, it was the precursor to the CIA.

OSS’s Simple Sabotage Field Manual, 1944

There’s a link at the top for the full pdf. And do note, OSS is Office of Special Services, the WWII precursor to the CIA - not Open Source Software lol.

Subterfuge at work, a fun subject to study.

Some of my favorites from a declassified WWII “simple productivity sabotage” manual:

• Insist on doing everything through “channels.” Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to expedite decisions.

• Make “speeches.” Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your “points” by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences.

• When possible, refer all matters to committees, for “further study and consideration.” Attempt to make the committee as large as possible — never less than five.

• Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.

• Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.

• Refer back to matters decided upon at the last meeting and attempt to re-open the question of the advisability of that decision.

• Advocate “caution.” Be “reasonable” and urge your fellow-conferees to be "reasonable"and avoid haste which might result in embarrassments or difficulties later on.

When I first saw these I was like goddamn, psyops got to my executive director!

I read about some smart tvs computing a hash of what’s on screen to phone home about, in attempt with figuring out what content a user is watching when that content is 3rd party controlled.

We need some privacy laws up in this mother fucker.

No I hate MS. I won’t ever forget the pain that was developing edge cases around Internet Explorer (fuck IE 6, that shit was the worst).

stupid clear background thing

In web design that’s called a modal.

I didn’t realize it till now, but I think this is how I pictured all bathrooms in Iowa looked.

I figured that’s why presidential candidates always stumped there first: Everyone feels really sorry for them due to shit like this.

Goddammit Leroy, alright everyone in!

cough

Fucking gyrenes, where’d all my crayons go?!

TempleOS has entered the chat.

They’re things on the road that take you to your abode.

“And there’s really cool people here!”

Get me a bucket, I’m gonna fucking puke.