

Did you like Oppenheimer? I saw it and while I won’t spoil the movie, I’ll just say I didn’t enjoy it. Like I was literally surprised at how much I didn’t enjoy it, I didn’t outright DISLIKE it, but it’s a no from me, dawg
US-based(as in originating or operating out of; I am not calling the US based.)💉(😢Formerly😢)Duterte’s Plug💊 (Pls come back Rodrigo, I won’t cut your drugs with baby powder anymore😢🥺🥺🥺)
Male He/Him, cis-het, Thotskyite🍑 ❤️🇧🇾🇮🇪❤️
Did you like Oppenheimer? I saw it and while I won’t spoil the movie, I’ll just say I didn’t enjoy it. Like I was literally surprised at how much I didn’t enjoy it, I didn’t outright DISLIKE it, but it’s a no from me, dawg
Send her to WALLa WALLa Washington🥁
This Scumbag needs to stop worrying about Niger and start worrying about them ugly-fuckin eyebrows she got, shits look like a knock-off Nike logo with her angry-lookin ass
I used to love watching fight vids on Reddit before I got banned :( it was a blessing and a curse, mostly a blessing bc life without reddit is better
Y’know people like to point to this and be like “oh so you guys refuse to debate? You must be afraid that your echo-chamber is not as secure as you think, I have some points that will really make you re-evaluate your stances” and yea at first glance any normal person will be like, ok let’s hear them out… now skip ahead like 3 years… those Mastur-debators were proven wrong and given book recommendations to help better define terms, better help understand key aspects of theory and class struggle/ societal structuring of class antagonisms, and history. You would think the Mastur-debators would be like “huh, I don’t actually know as much about Marxism-Leninism or Dial-Mat, etc. as much as I thought” but no! New ones pop up and ask the same questions, BEST CASE SCENARIO, they bring up a new point to be corrected. Worst case scenario: aka the most common one, they just parrot back the same talking points as the last one did, and we have to shut down debate and be like “bruh we already covered this please read this, I’m not typing out a whole 4 paragraphs, this is on you to do your research next time” and all of a sudden we’re tankies that don’t wanna debate because we’re afraid of it.
Vanilla? Yea that checks out
Kinda embarrassing to admit, but idk what that trident symbol means, I know it’s Ukrainian, but that’s about it, what are the origins of the symbol? Edit: I’m still confused lol
Винни Пух is the Eastern European Winnie the Pooh, I forget which country produced it, but when my grandma first got internet, she would show me old episodes of it, cool art style, I think it’s from the late 50s or 60s, I highly recommend it
Me reading Adrian Zenz’s Xinjiang IUD statistics
Not tryna be mean, what are you trying to say? Your comment was a bit confusing
Completely agree. Material Conditions> Dogmatic Laws
End of the day, the pot-smokers will smoke weed whether it’s legal or not, Cheech and Chong made a whole career out of breaking the laws around marijuana, and millions of others are breaking those same laws to this day around the world. If it’s illegal in a future society, I can guarantee that there will still be people smoking weed and it’s very likely it will not affect anyone else but those consuming it. Weed is really not that destructive, it’s used as a medical treatment for many different ailments, like glaucoma, stimulating the lateral hypothalamus for chemo patients, to write it off completely is dogmatic in my opinion
deleted by creator
I couldn’t agree more. The DEA-approved drug talks they gave in public schools (I attended) made people CURIOUS instead of skeptical of drugs because they would make it seem like 10 joints in a lifetime is equivalent to shooting up heroin everyday of your life. Kids obviously had older brothers or cousins that had smoked pot and never died, so they’d try it. If I can find it I’ll add the link in and edit, but there was a great video on how the D.A.R.E. Program completely backfired because it overhyped how dangerous drugs were instead of just being real about how harmful drugs can be.
I personally think it’s a waste of time and police funding but I can definitely understand the problems that plugs/dealers add to society
I can understand that, but alcohol definitely has a place in many traditions, some of which religious, and those won’t be easy to get rid of
Encourage reading!!! If my parents weren’t so positive about my love of reading at a young age (including Harry Potter lol) I DEFINITELY wouldn’t give enough of a shit about intellectual endeavors or political awareness. I would be a Bernie Bro AT BEST, probably a Centrist who doesn’t care. Also obviously raising a child like a human being, allowing them to have fun, obv not saying you would do this lol, but for example, don’t force your kids to study Marxism-Leninism at a young age, they’ll resent it
I never saw the movie “They Live” but I hear that some people interpreted the glasses in the film to be like psychedelics, is that accurate? I have not done psychedelics or seen the movie lol so I have no clue
Exactly! There’s a reason the movie “Leaving Las Vegas” didn’t feature Nicolas Cage smoking copious amounts of weed, it’s because that would just make you passout
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ElR8039mzNk “Are you up for a debate?”