Federating with lemmygrad has been a godsave every time this site has gone down.

Which would be super funny given that the Tiananmen Square wikipedia page agrees with us. It’d more likely link to some RFA propaganda page.

Any upbeared suggestion of a specific domain name will immediately get snapped up by other actors. I’d kind of advise against public specific suggestions.

You mean nature acts a holistic whole and it’s actually the imbalances introduced by recent, ubiquitous unthinking human exploitation that has had vast, all-reaching negative consequences??

Really? London is full of them. I’ve seen hundreds if not thousands of buildings with plastics disguised as brick.

Sharing the truth would have it decried as a misinformation tool to the point of being effectively censored everywhere but China, so for the best global uptake, it’s easiest to just refuse to talk about it.

It’s kind of that simple.

Is that actually brickwork? In western cities at least these aesthetics are always factory-produced cladding made of plastics.

I truly have failed to read.

deleted by creator

Well, not all ice core data is equal. It depends on the rate of ice accumulation, so high accumulation sites will give much higher precision, especially for more recent years (say, the last few centuries). But my assumption is that low accumulation sites are where we get most of our much older data. I could be totally wrong as I’m talking out my behind.

Low accumulation sites will smooth out the peaks to the scale of centuries, according to that other post, so what looks like 200 years of 300ppm could be a lot spikier in reality. Whether one can do some ‘further analysis’ I have no idea.

I agree 100% with your second paragraph, there’s nothing I’m aware of that suggests CO2 has spiked liked this before. And it seems highly unlikely that it would’ve. And we may well have evidence to actually disprove such a theory.

Nah that’s fair, and I certainly have no idea what I’m talking about either. But my understanding is that “ice core data” is a compilation of data from various ice core sampling, including those ‘lowest accumulation sites’ where they’re saying you can only measure to the precision of centuries.

Again, I don’t know, but I’m assuming we don’t have “high accumulation” ice core data for all of that history, so jumping 100+ ppm for a few decades and then falling again wouldn’t necessarily show up in those low accumulation sites.

Sadly practical prefix that I am not at all a skeptic - I just think this graph doesn’t show as much as one might argue.

Isn’t ice core data actually only an indicator of ‘average’ CO2 concentration rolling over so many years (decades-centuries)? CO2 diffuses in fresh forming ice, and is already averaged over the ‘trapping’ period, so historical peaks and troughs would be largely smoothed out. I don’t think this graph alone is really precise enough to claim CO2 levels could never have reached current levels for at minimum some decades (not that we have any evidence to suggest it did).

Can I get an advance in Xibucks to cover my expenses in the meantime?

Potential tagline?? This is exactly it - Both libs and Trump voters believe in magic that will solve all their ills, while believing the others’ magic is their antithesis. I don’t see either of them facing reality any more than the other.

Exactly, it’s already a one-party fascist dictatorship. Why take off the mask?

The culture wars sure are a handy excuse for ‘progressives’ to not materially help anyone

I don’t think Hulu specifically are being sneaky or are alone to blame - Whatever entities license out shows seem to actually be including mandatory ad breaks when you license their media. No idea why or how, but I’ve seen other streaming services declare they have no choice but to put ad breaks in certain films (they usually just advertise their own stuff, so it’s not even about the streaming service’s revenue).

Spoiler: Congress does not act