• 0 Posts
  • 163 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2025

help-circle



  • I find all digital art to be basically worthless, but at least the artists have a point of view or something to say. AI cannot do that. It can attempt to generate similar styles, but without anything to say, the “art” is just slop.

    This is why I meet artists, and buy their works physically. Tangible work, mistakes and all, like pen and paper, or sculpture or jewelry etc. But I get that is just personal preference.

    Eventually (and in some cases already) digital artists will just incorporate AI into their tool set, just like they did with shaders, and paths, and filters and all the other digital tools. At that point is it really AI art, or is it simply algorithm assisted? The works have something to say, the tool just made it easier to do so. We all know there is no such thing as AI, its just noise to image math formulas, the direction has to come from somewhere.

    What is art is always in question: look at the giant hotel and mass produced art factories. Is it still art, even when humans made it, or is just a factory on production mode?

    I really wish the corporations would shut the fuck up and quit pushing “AI” that is not AI though.








  • You are proving my point. Thanks.

    And while I am thinking about it…people like you make all of this worse. You have no idea what you are talking about, including insulting me over something I was not saying at all. But you keep being a loudmouth and tell people to be silent. I was not defending any of the negatives of using computers, but relating how YES people complained about them all the way back then, and to some degree the argument never changed.

    But you have to realize: using algorithyms (again there is no such thing as AI right now) is not the problem. It is marketing, how people use it without a clue, and corporations. Gee we actually have some things in common.

    But then you have to be a dick, and then I begin to not give a shit.