

deleted by creator


deleted by creator


They can, it’s not that hard. It won’t be perfect, but you can’t get perfect with privacy breaking means either.
The question is wil they?
And in some languages a number can be used as a name of a variable or a function, so it can be anything really


The article is about a XAML bug, which affects a lot of core components, when used in a corporate setting.




That seems like too literal of a reading? Dune was very much about current events told through allegory, not a warning for the future.
Techne without episteme, that’s things like corporations, capitalism, technocratic government etc. They don’t run on computers inside humanoid robots, but they’re made out of rules to achieve a goal and reduce humans to tools to enact those rules. Close enough if you’re writing a story.
Yes, and they push it less than tab groups and PWA. This is a nothingburger.


She platformed on this, they willingly voted for it.


I’d say there’s nothing inherently wrong with any of these. It’s the child trafficking and child molestation that’s the issue.
Kind of the opposite of forcing. Some people want it, I don’t agree with them, but better to not lose them to chrome.
But srsly Firefox nags me more about PWAs and tab groups than AI.


So it’s pro-subscription activism? Hmm ok


Not everything is. Besides pedophiles, they’re also actual fascists.


To a billion parameter matrix inverter? Probably not too hard, maybe not at those speeds.
To a GPU, or even just the functions used in GenAI? We don’t even know if those are possible with analog computers to begin with.


But it only does 16x16 matrix inversion.


That happens but you should look this guy up


Will they pay for it though? The real cost of it, I mean.
“Survival of the fittest” is about a species, not an individual. For larger animals pain and pleasure are the greatest teachers, because we can learn from those. These species benefit from individuals learning survival skills. Insects have no use for it, they don’t learn to adapt, they survive through numbers, their behavior adapts through evolution.
They react to damage the same way plants do. If you want to call that pain, sure. It doesn’t make sense evolutionary that they would suffer from it though.
And we know it’s not inherent to life. Even some people are born without nociceptors because of genetic issues. Not-suffering is a big problem, kids get infections etc because they don’t learn to stop hurting themselves.
Nature is very cruel, but not so evil to evolve suffering in animals who don’t have the capacity to learn from it.
More like 1, sometimes 2, errors in 90% of wikipedia’s longest and most active articles.