Or worse, they could be Australian!

marxism leninism is one thing, glazing Russia is another.

Approves ceasefire *again. Israel is comparable only to Russia when it comes to violating ceasefire agreements (In recent history). Until there is a major policy and/or leadership change in Jerusalem any ceasefire Is likely to be little more then a prelude to more bombings.

I really hope this drives a solid wedge between the authoritarian regime and the military.

Fair, perhaps I should rephrase it to “Fringe of sanity”. Although implying his beliefs were at all sane might be disingenuous.

She played the “Blame the immigrants” card and still got removed, that’s unusual to see. Here’s hoping the coalition here in Australia sees that and chooses to stop blaming immigrants for everything…

Fixed, I thought it looked wrong.

*Guns not money, they needed time to recover before Russia did a Russia again and invaded it’s neighbours.

Almost like he was just another fringe extremist whose death is being exploited for political and financial gain!

I get to die and save a bunch of people? I’m in!

We know how to do it, it’s just super inefficient.

Why do we give this clown any attention? Nothing the Kremlin says is worth considering as it has no correlation to what they will do.

2077 here we come…

Options, I’m entirely socially isolated.

Ain’t no way I’m scanning that, what does it say?

That and the fact that so few people died, murica and their guns…

Nuclear has only been used once, before it was known to the world and taboo, and there are plenty of strong arguments that the war was already over by the time the bombs dropped.

Chemical and biological weapons are hilariously imprecise and always back fire to some degree and are largely ineffectual (Look up mustard gas in the world wars for examples of how they were useless at actually taking ground or removing opposition)

And starvation like strategic bomb doesn’t really effect the war fighting capacity of a country and typically increases civilian support for the army to spite the ones inflicting them.

Countries use these weapons (aside from the first) because they are the epitome of “this is scary therefore it will work” but that’s an emotional argument not a factual one.

War crimes cause long lasting damage to their victims but don’t achieve military gains. Because if they worked they wouldn’t be war crimes they would just be war. when we created the list of war crimes scholars and generals worked together to make a list of strategies that the scholars wanted removed for humanitarian reasons and generals wanted removed for being ineffectual.

They aren’t though? No war crime has ever helped win a war.

A vehicle building/combat game called From The Depths is my current obsession, well past 1000 hours in it.

Goat licker is a good one, for example “You canoe humping goat licker!”