• 1 Post
  • 431 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 29th, 2024

help-circle


  • This is a little bit like having AIDS, getting a flare-up, and then saying “well I’m glad at least something is happeing”.

    I understand the frustration at the general political ambivalence following “the end of history” in the 90s and the endless wars in the 2000s, but a flare-up isn’t going to make the aids go away. In the absolute best case impossible scenario where everything that’s been going on miraculously stops tomorrow we’re still locked into another 50+ years of consequences from this administration, just like we have problems decades afterwards that can be traced back to the Reagan administration.

    In a worse case scenario, well, let’s just say that neither Germany nor Italy today are particularly better off or highly progressive compared to their neighbors. Like I said, having a flare-up does not cure your AIDS.

    If someone has a counter example from history I would unironically genuinely love to hear it, because at this point I’ve given up hope of the world becoming a socially better place in my lifetime.







  • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneSilence Rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    It kinda brothers me when I see something attributed to an entire country when it really only has to do with a small group or area within that county.

    Like a single town in India could do some thing, with 95% of the population having no idea about it, and the headline would say “look at this thing India did!”. I use India as an example because I feel like this happens with non english speaking or non-western countries more. Like, if it were US researchers that made the silence gun the caption would say “researchers at Harvard” instead of “the US did this”.

    I think its appropriate to use that phrasing when its something that was done as part of a national government project or policy, if its something that exists across a wide swath of the population/area of the country, or if you are comparing a thing across two countries (e.g. the Taiwanese semiconductor industry vs the South Korean one).











  • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneAnimals rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I assume this causes the pufferfish to expire?

    I ask because it makes me think of those toads you can lick. Psychoactive substances that are derived from animals are a pretty rare category, and ones that can be attained without harming the animal are an even smaller category within that. So its an interesting thing to think about.


  • The thing to understand about large organizations is that appearances matter a lot and the people working in them have to look busy. This is well known phenomenon among low level employees but it applies to managers and even executives too (who have to put on a show that they’re increasing shareholder value and that their company is special somehow).

    So, why do advertisers care if someone says “fuck” but not about someone whose spewing pseudointellectual misogynistic bullshit? Because there’s someone whose job description is “brand value” and if they’re not upset about something then they don’t look busy. The amount of “fucks” per minute is a really simple metric that (now that speech recognition is as good as it is) is really easy to measure. In other words its an easy way to look busy.

    Of course it doesn’t hurt that the guy’s boss is probably a conservative anyway, and so doesn’t mind the misogyny so much, but looking busy is the main reason.