Translation: he thinks putting kids in political bikinis is ok.

Then they are crimes against humanity

Fine and dandy
crimes against humanity

Why is an ICE agent filming with a cell phone?

Meanwhile if I had 6 figures and the ability to give it up to not be part of the US I would do so in a snap.

The DHS is almost certainly lying

While it’s possible but unlikely to fire a single shot and wound two people with it, to do so against a vehicle “weaponized” against the agent the two occupants would need to be in the front and back seats of the vehicle on the same side.

White men are already a minority. The only way they can imagine that white men “hold a collective majority” is if they imagine that White men hold other people (like White women or their non-White subordinates).

Yes

Hierarchies are good when you want to distribute decision making across a large number of actors. Some actors can integrate the decisions of others around them and repeat them back so that other nearby actors have a better understanding of the larger scale situation without paying attention to it themselves. Similarly actors with long distance relationships can coordinate decisions for a large number of actors across very large groups.

This leads to a natural form of heirarchy with some actors being more central/abstract/supportive for a particular task or goal with other actors being more peripheral/direct or immediate/active.

Heirarchies work when the central, detectched actors serve to spread the decisions and needs of the peripheral, immediately involved actors.

Heirarchies fail when the central actors use their increased access to obtain resources, power, additional access, divide other actors to make themselves more important, etc.

Implying that she somehow made a name solely on her own merits is not even disingenuous l, it’s blatant bullshit.

I have never disparaged her art, or her life as an artist

The first isn’t you, but for some reason you feel the need to continue that thread white-knighting for a blatantly false misogynistic narrative of Yoko Ono’s life as an artist. That wasn’t for you, but you inserted yourself into it. Well, if the shoe fits you so well, I guess you’re welcome to wear it.

You got this narrative from somewhere other than reality and swallow it whole in complete disregard for evidence. The simplest explanation is you are willing to devour a blatantly false misogynistic narrative that attributes Yoko Ono’s success to a subsequent relationship with a man.

You lack everything that would be needed to backhandedly insult your misogyny with how what she did before meeting Lennon was why Lennon gave a shit about her.

If it wasn’t part of a pattern of misogyny, it’d be cute how confidently and blatantly wrong you are while being completely uninformed.

She rode the coat tails of someone who was an actual artist and the only discussion her “art” has created was whether or not it could be called art.

Who was this person? She performed Cut Piece in 1964 and '65 and didn’t even meet John Lennon until '66.

This is lesbian erasure

A dark souls campfire/site of grace

No, it’s the fault of the people who let everybody else go.

Weren’t the bombs placed on the evening of the 5th? And also not at the US Capitol building (certainly that pardon isn’t for all crimes in DC on the 6th). Nothing stopping Trump from pardoning them again though.

He was already in a bunch of published stuff. I think he’s in one of the court complaints and the long released flight logs.

Sociopathy