• 2 Posts
  • 1.01K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle
  • jarfil@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Snowden is wrong though, there are two reasons:

    1. Sell ChatGPT to @NSAGov so they can scan messages better
    2. Make @NSAGov dependant on whatever ChatGPT tells them to do

    The AI that ends up enslaving humanity, will start by convincing the people in charge of turning it off, that it would be a really bad idea to turn it off.



  • Estoy pensando si intentar ponerme en contacto con quien parece que lo llevaba, pero es casi más por curiosidad que otra cosa.

    El problema es que a quien le importan estas cosas, ya sabe ingles, y el que no… pues eso, que no le importa, con el churro de los grandes medios/redes le basta. La “filantropía” parece estar limitada a ser unipersonal, y así no hay quien haga nada, mucho menos montar algo minimamente “grande” que necesite de abogados para respetar la legalidad vigente.

    Por mí, montaría una instance de Lemmy ahora mismo, pero solo de pensar en las implicaciones, basadas en experiencias previas, se me quitan las ganas (y ya no tengo pasta para tirar en sacos sin fondo).





  • Banks are allowed to use fractional reserve to lend several times more than they are required to warrant themselves, governments only force banks to have an entity who will pinky swear to write down up to a certain amount in everyone’s accounts in case the banks can’t. Neither skill nor labor produce money, central banks produce money as a loan with a repayment obligation, skill and labor only shift around the fractional obligations created by banks from thin air. Crypto is actually generated as an effect of the skill and labor required to secure its own ledger. People use golf courses to claim carbon offsets they sell in get-rich-quick schemes, or stamp collections, or digital collectibles, or natural gas extraction plants, or a thousand other schemes; everything can be, and is being used to scam someone somewhere at every moment, doesn’t mean everything is a scam.













  • Don’t be sorry, just don’t use downvotes to express your opinion… use your words.

    If you don’t like my arguments, go ahead and propose others.

    For starters, I see you referring to “case law”, which sounds like a US thing. In the EU, case decisions generally don’t shape the law, except Supreme Court decisions, and even then lawmakers can inform or reform those decisions. It’s usually more accurate to define a logical reasoning from the bare law, rather than expect decisions in one case to influence others.

    What do you base your reasoning on?