I wouldn’t call “what servers/clients?” a particularly broad question. Unless you’re serving the likes of Microsoft or Google, that can be very specific.
And, generally, no need to share unwanted personal details online.

I don’t actually know

Why not use your subscription feed?

I hope you could just copy paste it.

See the linked post at the top of their reply

“Apparently” according to what source

I believe (sea) turtles do just that

Id argue that when the government is spending millions to investigate a guy who isn’t even part of the government, it’s a political prosecution

I may not like it, but also kinda fair.

That you know of, or care to know of.

Yes, but also who cares. No need to point out that “technically there’s always a chance” because you can do that for basically anything.

He also had that one Elden Ring “build” where he was carrying like three shields

It’s certainly good, but I think it’d be better if we had some additional clean way of covering our base load. Like nuclear.

But were those renewables able to meet demand 100% of the time with sufficient battery backups?

Whatever the car in Distance is called

Or @X

Or a whole bunch of usernames, for that matter: Elon Musk’s X Has Started Selling Off Old Twitter Handles For Upwards Of $50,000

And where are those Arab countries now?

Not everyone knows of/has access to VPN’s.

I don’t disagree with your sentiment, but I also get why they’d rather try to resolve it legally. If they succeed it will allow for much easier access for the majority of visitors.

We were blocked in Turkey for 3 years or so, and fought all the way to the Supreme Court and won. Nothing has changed about our principles. The difference in this case is that the short term legal requirements in order to not wreck the long term chance of victory made this a necessary step.

Hopefully not block the entire website in India.

However, I can tell you that I went into the call initially very skeptical of the idea of even temporarily taking down this page and I was persuaded very quickly by a single fact that changed my mind: if we did not comply with this order, we would lose the possibility to appeal and the consequences would be dire in terms of achieving our ultimate goals here. For those who are concerned that this is somehow the WMF giving in on the principles that we all hold so dear, don’t worry.

Seems reasonable

The way Mozilla can advocate for web standards will be sorely missed.

Part of the reason Fairphone is so (relatively) expensive is because it also has a big focus on ethically sourced/produced parts.

When a Season Pass DLC is in pre-purchase mode, you are not required to release at least one DLC in the Season Pass at the time it goes on sale (as you are usually required to do when you launch a Season Pass). However, when the game launches, you will need to release the Season Pass out of pre-purchase–this will entail releasing at least one of the DLCs included in the Season Pass.

I’m not sure I like this part specifically.

This will essentially enforce day-1 DLC. Will it be enough for that DLC to be a simple cosmetic bundle with larger expansions to follow later?
But if a simple cosmetic bundle is enough to count as the included DLC, it kinda defeats the whole point. And, in turn, it might encourage developers to include very basic DLC where they might have wanted to release a series of proper expansions.

The rest sounds great though, with partial and complete refunds for unmet promises.