For Prodigy in particular, note that it is very much a kid’s show aimed at children. It’s fine Trek if you walk into it knowing and expecting that, but you need those expectations set beforehand. Think less “The Animated Series” and more “whatever Nickelodeon airs at 10am”.
No such disclaimer for Lower Decks. Jump right in blind. Works better the more traditional Trek you’ve seen.
Honestly most of the posts in this community don’t really fit the community
Ironically… so did I 🙃 But I hand-verified everything it said, and adjusted the quotes.
This study explicitly does not advocate for replacing teachers with AI, and repeatedly cautions against doing so
My technique isn’t as refined as yours, I just add on a minimum of 2 minutes and hope for the best
For full disclosure, I don’t usually chew noodles, and that may be a big part of my preference here. Also my most common noodles are fettuccine and macaroni, but I do the same with spaghetti.
Al dente noodles are also unpleasant. Just cook them a minute or two longer.
Our internal slack channels contain more and more AI-written posts, which makes me think: Thank you for throwing this wall of text on me and n other people. Now, n people need to extract the relevant information, so you are able to “save time” not writing the text yourself. Nice!!!
I think this is one of your best bets as far as getting a real policy change. Bring it up, mention that posts like that may take less time to “write”, but that they’re almost always obnoxiously verbose, contain paragraphs that say essentially nothing, and take far longer to read than a hand-typed message would. The argument that one person is saving time at the expense of dozens (?) of people losing time may carry a lot of weight, especially if these bosses are in and read the same Slack channel.
Past that I’d just let things go as they are, and take every opportunity to point out when AI made a problem, or made a problem more difficult to solve (while downplaying human-created problems).
I get the sentiment, but no serious company is going to survive for very long lying to its government when it receives search warrants. This is not a realistic solution.
I mean, what’s the alternative here? The Swiss government, which they are subject to, issued a legal warrant. Any email provider you want to use will be subject to warrants. All of them.
They are technically incapable by design of complying with warrants for email data. In this case they were able to provide personally identifying payment data because the person paid for their account with… a credit card. They offer crypto payment options, and would not have been able to usefully comply had the person used that method.
Their retraction article makes it crystal clear that their reporters are not allowed to use AI output in articles at all, unless it’s explicitly for demonstration purposes. That rule was broken. They took appropriate action, apologized, and made a commitment to do better.
I, frankly, believe them - ars is the news outlet I’ve frequented longer than any other for a reason. I understand if it’s going to take more for you to believe them, but it’s just one mistake. It’s also not clear to me what they could have done in this situation that would have felt like enough to you? Were you hoping for a play-by-play of who entered what into ChatGPT, or a firing or something?
I’m also not sure I’d consider the saga over. It wouldn’t overly surprise me if at some point this week we get a longer article going into more detail about what happened.
I think their response is perfectly reasonable. They took the article down and replaced it with an explanation of why, and posted an extremely visible retraction with open comments on their front page. They even reached out and apologized to the person who had the made-up quote attributed to them.
There are so many other outlets that would have just quietly taken the original article down without notice, or perhaps even just left it up.
My take on their comment was that they know this but consider it their ‘religion’ anyways because they don’t understand the process and so, in the absence of true understanding, take it on faith alone that the process actually works out
But the evidence is all around us even if you don’t understand the processes themselves: Science built us a moon landing, religion built us the dark ages
While the downturn went from gradual to rapid when ChatGPT released in late 2022, it looks like they’d been on a steady / gradually accelerating decline for a few years beforehand - they lost all their gains from 2012-onward before GenAI really became a thing.
Anyone know why? What was killing StackOverflow slowly before GenAI killed it quickly?
Why not? FDR had a podcast.
They can pass a bill all they want, but if they’re trying to regulate things like what a federal officer wears while on duty, it’s going to get struck down by the courts, in this administration or any other.
States have virtually no authority to regulate federal agents in that way. That’s why you don’t see laws like that.
Would you be nervous if your neighbor installed a gas fireplace?
Well now I would be…
When people say that, they aren’t implying the left are are morally superior. They’re implying the right has double standards. That the right is only interested in holding politicians on the left accountable, while giving politicians on the right free pass to do whatever.
It’s obviously true, and it’s a problem for the left, but it’s a problem of the right.
Some people said “We don’t like socialism” and some others said “Aye” and we’re all supposed to care because of their job or something
This classic xkcd led me down a long rabbit hole years after reading it that ended in the belief that the universe itself is an abstract instantiation of pure mathematics, and exists only in the sense that any such self-consistent mathematical structure must exist from its own point of view. I won’t get into the details here because it’ll turn into a long incoherent rant, but the general gist is that the idea in the comic should work - but then that the rocks themselves aren’t even necessary: The fact that a universe can exist is enough for it to exist, even if no one ever simulates it. Just like the question “What is the 10^(10^100)th prime number?” exists and has a definite answer, even though nobody will ever and can never calculate it, the answer to “What does a universe, with these initial conditions, and these laws of physics, look like at t = 13.7 billion years?” has an answer too, and it looks like you reading this comment.