• rufus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Sry, I think the innuendo got lost here. I was more holding up a mirror to their double-speak and trying to point out that if you really liked those goals, you’d take a different route. The conclusions these people jumped to, contradict each other and what they’re supposedly achieving.

    I think if they were for families and liberty, they’d do roughly what I said… Making me think that’s not what it’s about. For me they don’t need to come up with wrong reasons to justify it. They could just say ‘we hate people and freedom’ and at least that’d be honest and free of contradictions.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s kinda what I thought you were going for at first, but wasn’t sure.

      Either way, that document is full of language that would easily catch a reader thinking it’s all positive rather than manipulative.