• fine_sandy_bottom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everyone complaining about the judges leniency… consider that getting locked up would be absolute gold for trumps campaign. Infinite money as well as great exposure.

    Yeas it works be great to see him behind bars, but I’d prefer to play the long game.

    • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Wish more people understood this.

      Even if he was locked up for a lengthy period of time, he can campaign from jail. There is precedent for this. He has to be locked up under specific circumstances to stop his campaign.

    • Baggie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would wonder then what would be a better alternative? Like if he’s going to milk being a martyr then how can he be punished?

      • fine_sandy_bottom
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        He just needs to go to jail for a real crime with a penalty of many years.

        If you lock him up for a couple of days it just activates his base.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Name one famous example of a charismatic coup-attempting fascist getting locked up and rallying their supporters behind a manifesto referring to “their struggle”.

    • paholg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That is irrelevant. If Trump’s behavior would cause a regular schlub to be jailed, then he should be jailed, full stop. That’s how the law is supposed to work.

      • fine_sandy_bottom
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sorry but you’re gravely mistaken.

        A judges whole job is to interpret the law and to apply appropriate penalties given the circumstances.

        In some cases crimes have prescribed penalties - “exceeding the speed limit by 5mph” probably has a prescribed penalty.

        In other cases the judge must weight the circumstances and determine what penalty is appropriate.

        In this case, trump is antagonising the judge because it keeps his base engaged, and keeps campaign donations flowing in. Trump wants to go to jail because it would ignite his base. Why would a judge feel that penalty is appropriate? May as well give him a blow job.

        More to the point, the primary objective of any punishment in this case would be to cause Trump to desist. If putting him in jail is not going to do that, but rather give his contemptuous remarks a far greater reach, then why indeed put him in jail?

        Honestly, the best course of action for the judge and the correct “punishment” for Trump is to give his various utterances the least oxygen possible while preserving the authority of the court.