• Bjaldr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re blocking users who use UBO

    • Xero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t they already try to do that with manifest v3? They couldn’t do shit within their own chromium platform, I doubt they’d be able to do it now.

      And even if they could, UBO devs would just find a way around that.

    • Lord_Boffum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all of them, currently. And if they were to do that, I’m sure some handy people will find a way around that.

      • legalfinding@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They started blocking people who use ad blockers from watching videos if they don’t disable it on YouTube. I think they just started doing it in the last few weeks

        • eek2121@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have had no issues. Even if they did end up successfully blocking (not likely) the videos are accessible via 3rd party sites/clients. I don’t see Google ever being able to successfully block users without adding a login requirement, and even then…

        • markovianparallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think what people who are commenting here aren’t getting is that they’re only doing it to a percent of accounts and not ALL accounts.

      • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think Google ever blocked someone for abusing their services (unless it was GCP, which is not meant for personal use anyway), they believe in annoying a person to compliance instead of banning them.