• dino
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still no reason to use the flatpak if a repo packet exists.

    • pranqster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are a couple of reasons. For starters, the applications and all of their files/dependencies are contained in a single location, making them easier to manage/remove and help avoid any dependency hell. They’re distro agnostic, which makes it easier for developers and distro maintainers to troubleshoot. The applications are also somewhat sandboxed, which essentially doesn’t exist otherwise on any distro. Not a perfect solution by any means, but I install all of my main applications this way. Permissions can be further tweaked/restricted with Flatseal. Only thing I’d be wary of is installing any Chromium-based browser this way as it replaces Chromium’s layer-1 sandbox with Flatpak’s, which is inherently weaker.

      • dino
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am talking from a user perspective, not developer reasons. Also tinkering with flatseal = lol.

        • pranqster@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Most of what I said is from a user perspective. But, if you want to treat the discussion with condescension, then carry on doing what you do.