• Rikj000
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes we need them to survive,
    yes they’re better than Google.

    But no we’re not being too negative/hard on them!

    Lately Mozilla has been pulling a lot of anti-consumer yet pro shareholder shit.

    AI is a perfect example of that,
    unwanted by the majority of their community, yet still forced upon us by shareholders, for now through an optional addon, which appears to be a foot in the door, which can quickly grow into a baked in addon which ships with FireFox by default.

    Sources:

    They blatantly ignore their community,
    and for that we’re allowed to be angry with them.

    • apis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yup.

      DuckDuckGo’s search engine introduced AI assist and an AI chat as opt-out features, which it repeatedly re-enables at random, with no ability to disable it permanently, even though we’ve been able for years to set a bookmarklet to make all our other DDG settings persist.

      Users are very unhappy, with requests for a way to permanently disable AI features ignored, receiving only patronising responses from DDG.

      No matter, DDG’s utility for searching has deteriorated these past years so severely, even relative to the deterioration we’ve seen with many other options, that I wonder will it survive.

      It is always unfortunate when a recommended privacy tool shifts away from privacy, but several doing so all at once is alarming.

        • apis@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Have tried out SearxNG without self-hosting, via different instances, but had to abandon it as it is way, way beyond my mental capabilities to get it to work.

          I doubt I could manage to self-host, having looked into Docker for some other matter.

          Using Mojeek currently, which isn’t great but not too terrible.

          • Karna@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Though it is an off-topic but what exact issues you faced with SearxNG?

            • apis@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Well, it worked initially, then more often than not my searches produced no results or confusing error messages.

              Experimented a lot with the SearxNG settings, and also with my browser and firewall settings in case there was some issue there, and eventually gave up.

              I was unable to find information online about the issues I experienced, in part because I had no idea how to describe them in order to find help.

              Think I tried it in three different browsers, over the course of a month or so, but primarily in Firefox.

              • Karna@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                To be honest, I never tried publicly available instances of any privacy front-ends (SearxNG, Nitter, Redlib etc.). I always self-host and route all such traffic via VPN.

                My initial issue with SearxNG was with the default selection of search engines. Default inclusion of Qwant engine caused irrelevant and non-english results to return. Currently my selection is limited to Google, Bing and Brave as DDG takes around 2 sec to return result (based on the VPN server location I’m using).

                If you still remember the error messages, I might help to help fix that.