California’s solar energy boom is often hailed as a green success story but a new study reveals a murkier reality beneath the sunlit panels. Researchers uncover seven distinct forms of corruption threatening the integrity of the state s clean energy expansion, including favoritism, land grabs, and misleading environmental claims. Perhaps most eyebrow-raising are allegations of romantic entanglements between senior officials and solar lobbyists, blurring the lines between personal influence and public interest. The report paints a picture of a solar sector racing ahead while governance and ethical safeguards fall dangerously behind.
Is it more prevalent in the renewables than in the oil and gas?
If not, maybe we should focus on the first in class before trying to cast the doubt on the best in class… Especially in the current state of the USA.
and coal.
You raise a good point, though.
Agreed that oil and gas are far worse in these aspects.
Let’s not succumb to whataboutism, however. These are still important issues to consider to keep green energy sources ethical and to prevent corporate corruption and greenwashing of these alternative energy sources. This should be worth considering for those interested in green energy , especially for solarpunks practicing prefigurative politics, to prevent these issues in the future.
It’s not whataboutism. It’s getting the priorities straight and not getting distracted by false problems.
What is raised in the article is not specific to renewables. It’s pretty much generalized as soon as you have private interests.
So isolating renewables is improper and demagogic.
The article posted facts and supported findings. These are not “false problems” and are posted for information and discussion, not as a distraction.
The article is specifically about issues pertaining to the industry producing and selling renewables in California, USA. I have no private issues other than the sharing of information and constructive discussions about it. A share is not necessarily an endorsement and will not be received equally by all viewers though we should be able to engage in discussions without making assumptions about other users or unnecessarily pointing fingers.
The focus of this community is green energy and there will be posts that focus on renewables. This post is on topic and posts from others are are always welcome, provided no false information is shared and discussions don’t get combative.
Wow. So many empty words. So little time. You use exactly the same fallacies as O&G PR people. So either you are one of them, or you are a useful idiot.
In any case, sharing an article without any comment is an endorsement by default.
And the articles does isolate renewables, as if none of these problems occurred in any other industry. If it is shared by other industries, then it’s a social problem, not a renewables problem and the article is therefore de facto biaised.
🦜