• nilloc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As if 99% of cables aren’t bought at dollar stores and gas stations to charge phones for 2 weeks before being lost or damaged. And none of them bother with USB logos.

    All I really care about it the durability of the phone port, and usb c looks far more inherently fragile than lightning. 1/4 of the USB Cs on my MacBook Pro have issues, and my phone gets plugged and unplugged far more often, and only has one port.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean… That’s exactly why “unlabeled” is defaulted to USB 2 speeds and less than 60W. They’re already labeled correctly for this update.

    • mriormro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, you’re complaining that they’re standardizing logos so that the cables capabilities are clear?

      I mean, what would your solution be other than bitching?

    • mayo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel the same way about durability but apparently usb-c is rated to 10,000 insertions. Idk though. The lightning port has been very solid in regular use but I can’t say the same about the usb-c ports I’ve known.

      Eventually wireless charging will be the standard so it might not matter as much for phones.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d be curious to see how many of those cables without logos are actually USB certified as opposed to being compatible with the spec.