Meanwhile in Germany:

  • Aopen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Gritinks from Poland!

      • Opafi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        Electricity? Like, you use excess power to lift water and generate power from letting it descend when you need power. The latter is generated. Or am I not getting something?

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I know. It never generates more than it consumes so it has negative production overall. Or is this a real-time chart despite saying “past 12 months”?

          • Opafi@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I think the idea is that it only uses excess energy that would otherwise be wasted to fill it, so it kind of generates energy as it’s essentially filled for free.

            • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yes, I know. Still, misleading: they show up negative in these power generation charts most of the time and this is supposed to be a cumulative one.

            • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Yes, they are part of the water cycle, sometimes collecting water from a significant area, but usually not. This is the upper reservoir of our largest hydro storage plant:

              Dlouhé Stráně
              Rain is only collected over the area of the reservoir, and it would only fill up a few centimeters on a rainy day. In fact, the water evaporates quicker than that so a lake would never naturally form in this location.

              • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Are all hydro storage like that though? It doesn’t seem too outlandish to think of a hydro storage plant that is also fed by a river

                • Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I mean, at that point you would just call it a hydro power plant. Pretty much all hydropower doubles as storage due it’s flexibility, but typically don’t bother pumping water back up as it’s a waste of energy (as opposed to waiting for the river to do it’s work)

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’ve been to a hydro storage plant and I know how it works. It stores power by pumping water into an upper reservoir when there is excess power and then letting it through turbines at peak demand. Overall, it achieves about 80% efficient energy storage whose capacity scales very cheaply as opposed to battery storage, and can respond to demand in a minute.

          However, it never generates power in the usual sense so it should show up negative on an overall chart. Is this a real time one? I don’t think so because it says “past 12 months”.

          • Ziglin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I understand that it’s a net loss but maybe they’re only counting the power generated while unloading (which is still stupid but hey)

          • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Could a dam lake be counted as hydro storage? That wouldn’t require energy spending to pump water up, but it can work as a “cache”?

            • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Nope, that’s just regular hydroelectric. All hydro power plants have valves to control the flow and they do adjust them on demand, for turbine/filter maintenance, and/or hydrological event control.

              Also, dam lake is a misnomer because lakes are naturally occurring. The correct term is reservoir. However, a reservoir can be natural and not dammed, like the oldest Czech pumped storage power plant at Černé jezero, which I visited. (The reservoir is a beautiful mountain lake and unfortunately, nature preservationists capped the water level changes to 4 cm, limiting capacity.)

              • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Yeah I didn’t know the correct term for it in English, in Finnish it’s called “fakelake” or maybe more accurately “artificial lake”, but fakelake sounds better