I stumbled across this recently while going down a different rabbit hole and it stunned me. I missed this previously. It leaves me wondering why I am circumcised. I am a bit bitter still and always about having the tip of my penis chopped off in the name of tradition, Now I see this and wonder what justification my parents could have had in reality? Was it all just peer pressure? They were southern baptists, supposedly believing in NT over OT in any conflict. This is deep in the NT:

Galatians 5:2-6

2 Listen! I, Paul, am telling you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no benefit to you. 3 Once again I testify to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obliged to obey the entire law. 4 You who want to be justified by the law have cut yourselves off from Christ; you have fallen away from grace. 5 For through the Spirit, by faith, we eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness. 6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything; the only thing that counts is faith working through love.

I am an Atheist, Ex-Christian, Ex-Southern Baptist Apostate in my 40s. I talked to my mother about it, when I had a son. She said she just didn’t want me to stand out and circumcising was just what everyone else was doing. It drove home the point that my mother has never really thought for herself on any of that and much of it had impact on me. I’m thankful that my kids won’t have to go through all of that.

I’m venting because it dug up an old wound for me. As always, I’d love to hear some feedback.

  • Chrobin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    But you don’t remove the appendix preemptively, but if it’s medically necessary - same way circumcision should work.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You always remove the appendix before it becomes an issue. If u don’t you die. Same with a preemptive mastectomy.

      The “loss” from a circumcision in most cases is minimal especially when compared to the risk of infection.

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, when you remove it it is already an issue, it’s just not deadly yet.

        Also, yes, phimosis can almost always be corrected without circumcision, and it’s not as urgent as appendicitis.

        There is no need to mutilate the penis and remove a non-useless part that actually protects and lubricates the head, allows for better sensitivity, temperature control, etc. etc. only to not have to do it in some rare medical case that is not even urgent.