0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoSoftware Vendors Dump Open Source, Go For the Cash Grabtech.slashdot.orgexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1164arrow-down18
arrow-up1156arrow-down1external-linkSoftware Vendors Dump Open Source, Go For the Cash Grabtech.slashdot.org0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squaresmileyheadlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·8 months agoCompanies change licences, sometimes for bad, sometimes for good. Nothing new.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·8 months agoI think it’s usually for the worse, but I don’t have statistics. Do you have some examples of companies switching to a more open license?
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoMicrosoft has been open sourcing quite a lot recently. Does that count?
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoSure! I’d like to see a little more diversity than one org though…
minus-squareThomaslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoQt (the one used by KDE) has progressed not only through a number of owners (Trolltech, Digia, Nokia, …), but also licenses such as the QPL to be triple-licensed under GPL, LGPL, and commercial for most of its components.
Companies change licences, sometimes for bad, sometimes for good. Nothing new.
I think it’s usually for the worse, but I don’t have statistics. Do you have some examples of companies switching to a more open license?
Microsoft has been open sourcing quite a lot recently. Does that count?
Sure! I’d like to see a little more diversity than one org though…
Qt (the one used by KDE) has progressed not only through a number of owners (Trolltech, Digia, Nokia, …), but also licenses such as the QPL to be triple-licensed under GPL, LGPL, and commercial for most of its components.