Sally’s law is being introduced in the UK, which would make it so that people who murder their alleged abuser may be given lighter sentencing.
Sally’s Law is named after Sally Challen who admitted to killing her husband. She was tracking his movements, checking his phone, believing he was cheating on her and later said: “If I can’t have him, no-one can.” Challen was initially ordered to serve a minimum term of 22 years in jail. Jurors were told she attacked the retired businessman in August 2010, as he ate lunch at the kitchen table of their former marital home, using a hammer she had brought in her handbag. Keep in mind that she was not trapped in a relationship with this man and they had separated in 2009 and she begged to reconcile with him in 2010.
Her legal team succesfully appealed her sentence in 2019 on the basis of diminished responsibility. She received 14 years for manslaughter but walked free due to time served.
My gut tells me that murderers like Sally who admitted to killing her husband due to her insecurities will take advantage of this law, and that this won’t be applied to male victims of abuse.
I’m not against the law on principle, but I also suspect it won’t be applied equally between male and female victims.
I think I am against this, for 2 reasons. First, we want to encourage people who can’t stand each other to get away from each other, not kill each other. Second, putting this option out there means people will try to use it, whether or not it actually applies.
Oh great, another incentive for women to lie about abuse. This edition protects murderers!
She was tracking his movements […]
So, stalking?
[…] checking his phone, believing he was cheating on her […]
Well that’s controlling behaviour right there…
[…] and later said: “If I can’t have him, no-one can.”
Is possessiveness not considered a form of abuse (or a precursor to it) these days?
Of course, they would never consider her actions as abusive, would they?
[…] using a hammer she had brought in her handbag […]
No-one just happens to have a hammer in their handbag…
This law is stupid. If someone’s being abused and they murder someone, it’s seen on a case by case basis. Not based on a law.
What about men? What does it take for a man to prove he was being abused? Welts? Or emotional abuse counts?
deleted by creator
Don’t generalize. Not all women (or men, or other groups by innate characteristics) have the same behavior.
Ingerland moment. If only it would have been a stabbing…
Thats such a idiotic take for a law.
