Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1790arrow-down114cross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansinternet@kbin.social
arrow-up1776arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square100fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansinternet@kbin.social
minus-squareKayn@dormi.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down10·1 year ago Using a chromium fork also means you accept that google will dictate standards less harmful than web integrity. Are these condescending statements how you intend to get people to switch to Firefox?
Are these condescending statements how you intend to get people to switch to Firefox?