• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Anyone using their phone for photography has been using heavily edited images already.

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Analog cameras also do not catch an image exactly as-is. Most likely, the idea of a “true” image of exactly how a thing exists in the real world is just a fantasy. This is qualia. An image is definitionally subjective. Just look at the history of film technology and the racial biases it helped perserve.

        But there’s undeniably a huge difference between how you interpret and commit the photons going through the lens versus entirely inventing photons going through the lens.

        • Zorind@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Very neat article, glad you shared it!

          Interesting to think about now, they mention how modern digital cameras are not great at taking photos of interracial couples. I’m sure / hope someone is working on that, or at least maybe that’s a use case for some of the fancy photo post-processing - to take two photos with different exposure levels and somehow combine them to get accurate features from multiple people of various complexions in one photo.

          • vaalla
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Already exist, it’s called hdr and almost all modern camera supports them. But they take more time.