Mozilla Corp., which manages the open-source Firefox browser, announced today that Mitchell Baker is stepping down as CEO to focus on AI and internet safety as chair of the nonprofit foundation. Laura Chambers, a Mozilla board member and entrepreneur with experience at Airbnb, PayPal, and eBay, will step in as interim CEO to run operations until a permanent replacement is found.

https://archive.is/rmMEb

Official Blog Post: A New Chapter for Mozilla: Focused Execution and an Expanded Role in Charting the Internet’s Future

  • ferralcat@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Reading this new CEOs job history on linkedin is kinda infuriating. She goes from intern to head of consumer products at Skype in less than a year. Just… Frustrating to read that while I am and manage really good people who struggle for decades in the trenches to get even paltry job opportunities.

    But she got her MBA from Stanford so nepotism ahoy I guess.

    • anar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah. “Airbnb, Paypal, and ebay” doesn’t inspire confidance either

    • Joker
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      How is getting an MBA from Stanford nepotism? She probably worked her ass off not only to earn the degree but to be accepted to the university in the first place. Without knowing anything about her, I’m going to assume she’s a total rockstar until there’s a good reason to believe otherwise.

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          Biggest predictor of future success is the zip code you’re born into.

          To your specific point, the preponderance of PERCEIVED hard work in the nepotism community is definitely worth mentioning. Hard work, as an objective measure, would be the exception in this camp.

        • abbenm@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          okay but still where is the nepotism? You’ve commented on the general hypothetical possibility of nepotism not having been dis-proven.

          Being at Stanford in and of itself is not nepotism so it’s a pretty fair question to those of us who want words to mean things.

        • Joker
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Where is the evidence of nepotism? The person I replied to mentioned the Stanford degree and immediately jumped to the conclusion that it all comes down to nepotism. Frankly, it sounds like jealousy and taking cheap shots at someone who is doing well. I don’t understand it. Why knock someone else down? She’s successful so good for her. My own success will only come from me. What someone else did or did not achieve or how they did it is irrelevant to what I achieve.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Buddy, if you told me you had an MBA from Stanford, I would give you a box of crayons and take bets on how long you could go without eating them.

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          The MBA would immediately toss 5 crayons from the box and announce they’re only going to color with the remaining 10, collect a bonus, and then take a vacation after a hard days work.

      • Iapar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Without knowing anything about her you shouldn’t assume anything about her.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      That…can’t be accurate, surely? I’ve never known someone go from an internship to a senior IC role in less than a year, let alone leadership - unless the Skype head roles are glorified management roles?