Plummeting food prices feed steep annual drop amid renewed calls to stimulate economy and offset weakening demand

China’s consumer prices fell at their fastest pace in 15 years in January, as the world’s second-largest economy sank deeper into deflation amid weakening demand.

Data released on Thursday showed that China’s consumer price index tumbled last month, falling by 0.8% compared with a year earlier. It marks the fourth consecutive month of declines, as well as the sharpest drop since September 2009, when the global economy was still grappling with aftershocks from the 2008 banking crisis.

Food prices were the biggest drag on the headline inflation figure, having fallen by 5.9% on an annual basis, due in part to a 17% slump in pork prices. Fresh vegetables fell by 12.7%, while fruit dropped by 9.1%.

China’s economy has been struggling to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic after restrictions were lifted in late 2022. It has also been dealt a significant blow by the contraction in its indebted property sector, leading to the developer Evergrande being ordered to liquidate last month.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s not the “too cheap” it’s the sudden very noticeable drop in price, and if they don’t notice at first, the continued drop in price to match the deflated currency value

    Just look at everyone who’s lost their shirt on crypto, hodl hodl hodl until the value starts dropping again and suddenly whoever got out last is poor as a grass farmer

    • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      So am I understanding then that you’re not talking about average consumers but bulk buyers?

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        No them too, you’re not gonna see people willingly starve themselves in this pattern but you will see them go out of their way to avoid spending more than they have to on it

        You’re trying to assume that the entire premise is invalid because people will naturally have different spending habits for necessity, comfort, and luxury goods.