• steakmeout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s literally a tech company. The laws the company tests are all about the impact of tech.

    • daYMAN007@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are not sellung technology. If i could buy a license to run twitter on my server then you would be correct.

      Twitter is a socialmedia company . Just as uber is rideshare company

      • steakmeout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In your mind a company has to sell tech to be a tech company. Is Google a tech company? Were they not a tech company when they developed a sorting algorithm for the web? Were they not a tech company when they started spelling targeted advertising based on that algorithm? Of they were and are.

    • DogMuffins
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The laws the company tests are all about the impact of tech.

      This could be said of any large multinational.

      BHP is a multinational mining company worth 4x twitter which tests laws around the impact of tech. If they wanted to re-brand would that be tech news ?

      • steakmeout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. And when BHP tests laws in ways that are newsworthy people can discuss them here. The disconnect in your logic is hilarious.