I used slackware decades ago. Didn’t know it was still around. Why would I use slackware over something like arch?

  • EugeneNine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No systemd for one thing. Arch is a rolling release but Slackware only updates things when necessary.

    • slacktoid@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you are adventurous, you can run slackware-current. It is “not” recommended, but is also pretty stable if you want a bleeding edge Slackware experience.

      • EugeneNine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, current is closely the equivalent of a rolling distro. Its still more stable than other OS’s which start with a W

  • superkret@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would I use slackware over something like arch?

    If you want something like Arch, but stable.

  • slacktoid@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s still around. Stable is 15.0 and still maintained by Patt!

    Why would I use slackware over something like arch?

    Traditional Unix like approach, stability, nice community. But, it would depend on what you want and look for in an OS. Arch is good too.