CucumberFetish@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 months agoCostly rulelemm.eeimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1568arrow-down11
arrow-up1567arrow-down1imageCostly rulelemm.eeCucumberFetish@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 months agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squarefallingcatslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-29 months agoTurn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
minus-squareMiss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoReflex at 100 fps still won’t compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
minus-squarefallingcatslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoI wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
minus-squareMiss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoReflex just shaves off the extra overhead you’d get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won’t make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
minus-squarefallingcatslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoI know, that’s exactly what I am talking about
minus-squareMiss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoI think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then
Turn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
Reflex at 100 fps still won’t compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
I wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
Reflex just shaves off the extra overhead you’d get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won’t make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
I know, that’s exactly what I am talking about
I think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then