• jtmetcalfe@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate it too but there’s a reason books have a portrait resolution, it’s easier to scan when you’re holding it in front of your face

    • Poggervania@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guy, books were portrait-oriented because you can get more words on paper that way. They were literally made before phones were even a thing.

    • ᕮᐯIᒪ Tᕼᕮ ᑕᗩT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      takes a deep breath

      Okay, let’s do an autopsy of your reply:

      1. Books don’t have a resolution. They’re paper.

      2. “Portrait” is an orientation, not a resolution.

      3. Movies aren’t books.