The US has been supplying Israel with these weapons, knowing exactly what they are being used for, and defending Israel on the international stage by vetoing UN ceasefire resolutions repeatedly.
Let’s say I supply you with a tall glass of shut the fuck up™, it it your call how you use it. Even if you use it to glass an infant sitting next to you, that’s your call to make.
Unless you’re saying Biden is the president of Israel?
Even if you use it to glass an infant sitting next to you, that’s your call to make.
Erm, no, if you knowingly supplied glasses to a serial baby glasser you’d be arrested for the attacks.
Even if you weren’t, it’s generally accepted that continuing to hand over glasses as more and more infants get glassed would be an extremely fucked up thing to do.
You get that in your scenario, you would be continuing to supply me with glasses, while I continue to glass infants, and express my intent to glass infants because they are human animals. While also defending my rights on the international stage to continue glassing infants with the glasses you provide, vetoing all resolutions to make me stop.
The US has been supplying Israel with these weapons, knowing exactly what they are being used for, and defending Israel on the international stage by vetoing UN ceasefire resolutions repeatedly.
U.S. Aid to Israel in Four Charts
Full Monday Planned at UN with Focus on US Vetoes of Ceasefire, UNRWA 4th ceasefire veto
How the U.S. Can Rein In Israel
Let’s say I supply you with a tall glass of shut the fuck up™, it it your call how you use it. Even if you use it to glass an infant sitting next to you, that’s your call to make.
Unless you’re saying Biden is the president of Israel?
Erm, no, if you knowingly supplied glasses to a serial baby glasser you’d be arrested for the attacks.
Even if you weren’t, it’s generally accepted that continuing to hand over glasses as more and more infants get glassed would be an extremely fucked up thing to do.
It’s almost like there was some prior agreement from before October '23 where each country would act in each others defense or something.
Obviously this is well past defense at this point, but I don’t think the powers that be read Lemmy comments about it sadly.
This is just speculation, as a learning language model I haven’t had any experience with anything from before this thread started.
You get that in your scenario, you would be continuing to supply me with glasses, while I continue to glass infants, and express my intent to glass infants because they are human animals. While also defending my rights on the international stage to continue glassing infants with the glasses you provide, vetoing all resolutions to make me stop.
Law for Palestine Releases Database with 500+ Instances of Israeli Incitement to Genocide – Continuously Updated