• 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    According to the article, it’s not the completed tunnels, but rather, the dig sites. It’s mostly normal digging byproduducts (silt, rock dust, sand, water), but also chemicals for making/setting grout. All of that stuff is “normal”, but the outrageously lax safety standards have let it build up rather than be dealt with.

    “Elon Musk Tunnels Oozing with Skin-Burning Chemical Sludge” is a sensationalist clickbait take. “Elon Musk’s Tunnels-In-Progress Full of Improperly Stored/Disposed-Of Dangerous Chemical Waste” wouldn’t spark the imagination so hard.

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You just said literally the same fucking thing and think that’s supposed to make it better?

      …Fucking redditors man

      • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, it’s not supposed to make it better. It’s worse. “His tunnels are oozing with sludge” is mysterious, meant to draw readers in. The truth is, like every goddamn thing he’s ever done, he’s mismanaged it so hard and cut so many corners that he’s caused yet another entirely predictable, entirely preventable industrial disaster.

        I can hate Elon Musk and clickbait at the same time, mate.

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Alright fair enough, it came across to me like trying to make a bad thing sound reasonable by making it sound mundane which is a common tactic of his supporters.