• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    If I buy a single player game, more than likely, valve is making entirely profit on that 30%. The cost of the download is below a penny to valve. Yet they still get s third of that companies revenue.

    Charge them for the services if you want. They aren’t doing thst, they are taking 30% of an industries revenue for doing nearly nothing.

    • ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      And Valve has other bills to pay, servers to run, employees to pay. Software to develop, did you think all of these great features Steam has were free to develop? Incidentally, remember when Valve released their in house animation software for free when people asked to buy it?

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        did you think all of these great features Steam has were free to develop?

        No, just that they cost substantially less than the insane profits they’re making, and they could very easily afford to do all the same things with half the revenue, enabling actual developers to make more and better games.

    • JJLinux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You pay for the game once, whether you download it once or a million times. Valve gets the 30% once, because if you don’t pay again, 30% of 0 is still 0. At least that’s how percentages worked back in the day, who knows how it works now 🤣🤣