• WldFyre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can’t tell if you’re joking or not, but gamergate was absolutely not about “ethics in game journalism.”

    • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Did they edit their comment? Neither they nor the article mentioned gamergate.

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        “It’s about ethics in gaming journalism” was the common refrain for Gamergate proponents.

    • time_lord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not joking. It absolutely was about ethics, at first. The initial kickoff was the boyfriend accusing the girl (Zoë Quinn?) of sleeping with someone else for a better review. That’s ethics in a nutshell. I don’t think that anyone really cared about the game, or who was involved, but rather that the state of the industry was such that you could accuse a well known game reviewer of being unethical, and it was more believable than not.

      The fact is, reviewers had already sold their souls and a AAA game get anything less than a 90%. Had reviewers had better ethics, probably no one would have believed the boyfriend, and the entire story would have been a nothing-burger.

      Of course it went off the rails after that, the fact that the boyfriend was lying didn’t help, but for a brief moment it looked like there might actually be game news/review industry reform. It was a glorious 24 or so hours.