• SineIraEtStudio@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Interesting stuff.

    I’d suggest reducing the decimals (significant figures) to a more readable amount (like 1 or 2). Additionally, inconsistent number of decimals makes it harder to compare down a column. Ex: 2.23 instead of 2.23758366384763.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. The data is interesting, but that level of accuracy likely doesn’t mean anything, and it’s really hard to read. Plus, humans are really terrible at conceptualizing large numbers (even if it’s ultimately a representation of a fraction).

      Accuracy may be important in calculations, but Excel will handle accuracy apart from forcing it to show only two decimal places.

      • thubnOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you for the feedback. I decreased the amount of decimals to 1 and changed the percent values to the percent format.