The Salt Lake Police Department is defending itself in the case of the man accused of a string of hit-and-runs in the city and questions about why Ahn Pham wasn’t arrested after the initial hit-and-run last August.

A department spokesman told KSL TV that the case was investigated as an aggravated assault. But, it was determined that there wasn’t enough probable cause to arrest Pham, despite having a license plate number, a victim, and two witness accounts of what happened.

  • JoBo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think that is true. But even if it was, this particular hit and run hit a person. As you know because the guy turned out to be a fucking serial killer using his car as a weapon.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      As I’ve said, this particular case is different. But why would the majority of hit and runs involve injuries? The majority of car accidents do not involve serious injuries. The ones that make the news do, but most accidents are minor

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve no idea why you’re wriggling so very hard to exonerate the police here but it is a really fucking terrible look. HTH

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m not? I’ve said multiple times that this case is different.

          Once more, people, in general, should not be locked up for causing minor damage to another vehicle, even when they flee the scene.

          As I have said MULTIPLE times, if the hit and run involves targeting a person or a major crash that injures someone, that is different

          • JoBo@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            No one has argued for anyone to be locked up for causing minor damage to inanimate objects.

            If you are unwilling to grapple with the details of this offender and/or unable to quit your knee-jerk defence of the police persistently ignoring the crimes of predators, just keep your fucking mouth shut.

            Before the first crash, on Aug. 22, 2023, witnesses saw a white sedan with a license plate number registered to Pham pull up beside a 36-year-old woman. She shrugged off the vehicle and began to run away when the car “sped up and hit [her] causing her to fly over the vehicle and land on the ground hard,” charging documents state. The driver then sped away.

            • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Except people have disagreed with my statements?

              I’m not talking about the article, I’ve already discussed that in other threads. Of course they fucked up and should have more aggressively pursued Pham.

              • JoBo@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                You’re on the wrong thread. I don’t care that you got here because you’re an idle blabbermouth who prefers spouting words to reading them. It’s well past time for you to fuck off.

                • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Idk why you’re so mad, we literally agree on this? And I read the article, dude.