I can tell from experience that image generation software will create nonsense watermarks surprisingly often, if its training data included images with watermarks.
Take a closer look at the image. It has many telltale signs of an AI-image.
Has it ever generated a watermark this consistently? Best I’ve seen was corner watermarks, or whole image garbled hallucinations.
And while I may have written it in a humorous way, I bet many people will create images using the “type text to fill in the selected spot” tool, then put their own watermark all over the end result. Because it’s their work and they need to protect it, y’know, in case someone steals their meme (don’t try making sense of it, just hope they don’t also claim an NFT…).
No way, it has the author’s watermark in cursive… maybe they used PhotoShop’s AI without realizing.
I can tell from experience that image generation software will create nonsense watermarks surprisingly often, if its training data included images with watermarks.
Take a closer look at the image. It has many telltale signs of an AI-image.
Has it ever generated a watermark this consistently? Best I’ve seen was corner watermarks, or whole image garbled hallucinations.
And while I may have written it in a humorous way, I bet many people will create images using the “type text to fill in the selected spot” tool, then put their own watermark all over the end result. Because it’s their work and they need to protect it, y’know, in case someone steals their meme (don’t try making sense of it, just hope they don’t also claim an NFT…).
Look at the hands. There’s always at least one weird hand.
Erm… I don’t think you’re answering to what you think you are. 🙄
Sorry, should’ve replied to your first comment. I was just saying it’s obviously ai, like you apparently agreed with in the reply I replied to.
Np. I tried to put some humor into it… maybe I’m just sleep deprived and hallucinating 😅