• Ichipurka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    A funeral hurst the climate. Please don’t die.

    If you do, do it in the woods. So your body feeds the flora and fauna.

    • Erikatharsis@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      I walk around in biodegradable clothes covered from head to toe in pockets filled with native seed balls, so that when I inevitably die from heatstroke within the next five years, the pockets will eventually degrade and spill out hundreds of seeds to sprout and feed upon my decaying corpse. Call that kamikaze gardening

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So you are like gurillia utaru? I’m down for that.

        Hopefully you have a lot of super drought and heat resistant species that are also somehow magically hardy in climates that get winter, because the extremes are getting more extreme.

        I’m legitimately so glad CRISPR is in the hands of pretty much everyone, and that kids are (and have been for many years) designing next-gen bioengineered 4H agriculture and farming projects, because they definitely have the vision to produce what we need and they don’t know they can’t do it (like we think we do) so they can!

          • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Wasn’t sure if that reference would hit, my bad. The utaru are a society of people in horizon forbidden west who are super in tune with the lands around them.

            They each carry a seed pouch with them throughout their lives, and add seeds that are meaningful to them.

            Upon death, when the seed pouch can be recovered, it’s planted in the sacred grove and tended as a memorial.

            Guerrilla just refers to them being planted wherever instead of being brought home, like guerrilla gardening (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerrilla_gardening)

            I’m realizing now that’s a lot of really niche references I took for granted, that’s totally my bad.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I keep telling people to just throw me in the bush in a burlap sack because I don’t care. I should get a will going…

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s in my will, actually. I have no attachment to my physical body once I’m dead. Donate me to science and put the rest of me in the ground and plant a tree on my corpse 🤷

  • eleanor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I found this article quite interesting as it adds some much-needed context to the original.

    It’s mostly saying that, on a per-calorie basis, rice produces notably more methane compared to most other grains but still very much less than animal-agriculture (specifically, cows).

    Realistically, rice will continue to be needed as a staple food in many places so it can’t be broadly eliminated as a food source. Most consumers who are trying to reduce emissions will be better off looking for ways to reduce their consumption of meat and dairy as it will have a bigger impact.

  • nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Capitalists: Climate change is your fault and here’s an exhaustive list of every little thing a normal person does and how it negatively impacts the environment

    You: fails to either learn to photosynthesize, or starve to death

    Capitalists: Ugh, I can’t believe you would do this to the environment! This is all your fault!

    • galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here it is, blaming emissions on capitalism again though plenty of non capitalist societies were just as poor for the environment within the context of their time. Just because in your preferred system you think you could force through the changes you want does not mean that that is a better system. What makes you think you will be in power or in the majority? If your preferred system is decentralized, that requires a lot of education, the same type that could literally solve this issue with the current system. If your system only works with massive amounts of education and trust, it cannot scale.

      Maybe we should focus on the task at hand instead of trying to focus on radical change that will likely make the problem much worse before it gets better. You are literally making the situation worse because you are turning people against actual progress over your ideology.

      Emissions based regulations are completely achievable and capitalist. It’s called addressing an externality. Additionally, avoiding the tragedy of the commons requires international treaties which take time, economic alignment, and robust demand on all sides.

      • nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Emissions based regulations are completely achievable and capitalist

        Yes, that’s my whole point. They put the blame on us to distract us from enacting regulations with teeth. I’m not a hardcore socialist, just don’t like billionaires and companies lobbying to keep laws in their favor while simultaneously blaming us for everything.

        • galloog1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          But then those are not capitalists. That’s just anti environmentalism. Your language does not win you allies.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s a fundamental contradiction between the capitalist reach for yield and environmental regulations.

        In the long run, not having environmental regulations is bad for the market. In the short run, though, businesses can make a lot of money very quickly when they’re not regulated. This tension has lead to deadlock in every capitalist nation on Earth and it’s not getting better.

        • galloog1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We may disagree on these points but it should be obvious that there’s plenty of opposition to your preferred system in the majority of the modern world. That’s why insisting on radical change as a precursor to action is counter productive to actual mitigation of climate effects. Even if you are right about the system being less effective at environmentalism, you are hiring the efforts to do something about the issue now and drastic action is needed.

          That same tension existed in regards to national parks, CFCs, water management, wildlife management, waste management, and many other issues. What makes you think climate is any different other than bigger?

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That same tension existed in regards to national parks, CFCs, water management, wildlife management, waste management, and many other issues. What makes you think climate is any different other than bigger?

            All of that was implemented while the USSR was still around. Without the boogyman around to scare capitalists into reforming themselves and implementing sustainable business practices, they won’t do it. That’s why we’ve been seeing all those Cold War era reforms eroded one after another, there’s just no need to placate the masses.

            Maybe climate change can be the boogyman that the USSR was. It doesn’t seem to be working, though.

            • galloog1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think it was the USSR that was the motivation behind it, at least the ones during that period. It might’ve been more the hatred of cities, cancer, disease, and pests respectively. I will admit, giving the USSR credit for the environmental movement in the US is a creative and new one for me. You are off by about 25 years there for the beginning but it’s close.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The USSR deserves credit for pretty much every good idea the US has ever had since the New Deal.

                And now that the USSR is gone, everything good the US has ever done is being eroded by fascists.

                Makes you think!

                • galloog1@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, that was me. I take credit for it all. No autonomy for anyone.

                  Ideas are great. Execution begets prosperity.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Definitely not massively polluting megacorps. Nope, it’s definitely billions of poor people eating grain.

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I exchange the rice for lo mein every single time.

    If I’m going to eat a bunch of carbs, they should at least taste good. I live in an Asian neighborhood so I eat a lot of Asian food; still don’t understand the obsession with rice.

  • Warfarin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes everything is climate change

    Except when the elites do it, they can use private jets, hot water, gas, eat what they want and do what they want without consequences

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bill-gates-private-jet-doesnt-make-him-hypocrite-because-he-invests-billions-into-climate-change/#:~:text=Gates responded%2C "Yeah.,use plant-based aviation fuel.

    But what you do will never be enough

    Anyone who thinks this shit makes a difference and ignoring what China is doing on the daily are just virtue signaling fools

  • Moohamin12@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This newspaper is from my country.

    It was so badly run by some nepo hire that it went non profit.

    A newspaper went non profit.

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hahah, that’s such a smooth reply tweet, I love when people use “bad english” on purpose. Is like a pair of jeans that are artificially weathered to make them look more beautiful. Interestingly, I feel like you can do it wrong and have actual bad “bad english”