cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/news/t/47477

A survey shows perceptions of the Florida governor’s favorabilty have dropped, even among Republicans, as he refuses to back down in a feud with Disney.

  • dog@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    he’s on a failing crusade. he thought this would make him look cool but it makes him look like an idiot to almost everybody. good job, buddy 👏

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    where would Disney go if they pulled out of Florida entirely? it’d have to be somewhere warmish, I cant see them moving to Maine/Michigan/Montana

    • JackFromWisconsin@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do have a large presence in California already. But I don’t see them fully pulling out of Florida at all. They’ll keep what exists here, but I wouldn’t expect much further growth in the short-term.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They basically became their own county, maybe they will set their sights on controlling the state somehow. Hard to do business with the possibility of crazy governors and legislatures.

      • tallwookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        if a lower population state was warmer year round I could see them moving over time - easier to control if there’s less opposition. and what happened in Florida is a good lesson - for governments/policy makers as well as corporations

        • Spacemanspliff@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem I see is them being willing to put in the money required to buy up that much land. They were able to build as big as they were in Florida because they were able to buy up a bunch of swamp land using shell corps and then develop it all during a time where there weren’t as many (if any) environmental policies. Even if they were to try and buy and develop a bunch of swamp in say Louisiana or Mississippi and use the same plans, the environmental cost of disturbing that much swamp land is astronomical.

  • nzodd@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Better for him if his ambitions die this year instead of in a bunker with his dog and girlfriend after he’s destroyed our economy and ruined millions of lives.