return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoBiden signs bill criticized as “major expansion of warrantless surveillance”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1486arrow-down123cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zippolitics@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.net
arrow-up1463arrow-down1external-linkBiden signs bill criticized as “major expansion of warrantless surveillance”arstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square88fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zippolitics@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.net
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-27 months agoHe would have opposed the Civil Rights Act “because of the property rights element.” See? Principled stand. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/91287-paul-says-he-would-have-opposed-1964-civil-rights-act/
minus-squarePsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI’m talking pure theory/ethics now. What I’d support politically will vary. I agree with free association and, to some degree, property rights. I don’t think my “yeah, fuck racists” stance is principled.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoOkay, but we aren’t talking about you.
He would have opposed the Civil Rights Act “because of the property rights element.” See? Principled stand.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/91287-paul-says-he-would-have-opposed-1964-civil-rights-act/
I’m talking pure theory/ethics now. What I’d support politically will vary.
I agree with free association and, to some degree, property rights. I don’t think my “yeah, fuck racists” stance is principled.
Okay, but we aren’t talking about you.