Video is actually a really terrible medium with which to convey actual information, it’s only benefit is that it makes information more palettable to people not accustomed to learning things.
It genuinely concerns me that there are people like your good self who think that a youtube video is a good way to learn about a complex and nuanced topic like charities, non profits, and philanthropy.
To be clear, the “explainer” producing the linked video is in the business of selling views, not providing balanced, reliable information. These two objectives are incongruous.
Sadly, your comment says more about your own inability to absorb information than it does about mine. “Hilarious” indeed.
Sorry chief.
Video is actually a really terrible medium with which to convey actual information, it’s only benefit is that it makes information more palettable to people not accustomed to learning things.
It genuinely concerns me that there are people like your good self who think that a youtube video is a good way to learn about a complex and nuanced topic like charities, non profits, and philanthropy.
To be clear, the “explainer” producing the linked video is in the business of selling views, not providing balanced, reliable information. These two objectives are incongruous.
Sadly, your comment says more about your own inability to absorb information than it does about mine. “Hilarious” indeed.