The western values Ukraine is defending are becoming more apparent by the day.

  • gladflag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    So if enough people won’t fight the government should shut down and let the invaders take over? Is that your alternative? Civilisations sometimes need to force people to work for a common good. See also vaccines.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      common good

      what is good for the commons about shoveling more unwilling ukrainian bodies at a fight they want to be over

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        awesome yes, they should let putin take everything over so he can then shovel Ukrainian and Russian bodies into his next annexation project!

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          yeah if they want to surrender that’s their decision, lmao? people in other countries don’t exist to be pawns of US foreign policy, they actually have their own lives and interests

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      If even an actual invasion does not motivate a sufficient number of people to volunteer to fight for their government, then why should that government be seen as worth preserving?

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The “common good” in bourgeois democracies is the good of the capitalist class at the expense of the working class.

      Wikipedia: Bourgeois revolution

      Bourgeois revolution is a term used in Marxist theory to refer to a social revolution that aims to destroy a feudal system or its vestiges, establish the rule of the bourgeoisie, and create a bourgeois (capitalist) state. In colonised or subjugated countries, bourgeois revolutions often take the form of a war of national independence. The Dutch, English, American, and French revolutions are considered the archetypal bourgeois revolutions, in that they attempted to clear away the remnants of the medieval feudal system, so as to pave the way for the rise of capitalism. The term is usually used in contrast to “proletarian revolution”, and is also sometimes called a “bourgeois-democratic revolution”

      BBC: [Princeton] Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy

      I don’t mean to imply that Russia isn’t a bourgeoise democracy—it is as well, but at least it’s not under the boot of the imperial core like Ukraine is. Russia emancipated itself from the US neocolonial shock therapy plundering that began with Yeltsin and ended with Putin.